OMG, OMG, OMG, can you believe these guys!

A recent comment was added to a discussion on the playhouse lounge in Burlington, NJ. [view link] These guys stated a dancer's name, OMG! Don't they know that they are supposed to adhere to the position taken by that TUSCL's resident know it all, call me Ishmael, who believes that a dancer's name shouldn't be included? CIM, why haven't you barged into that thread telling them of the problems they're causing by doing this? Aren't you going to send them a private message and lecture them on the perils of the practice? You spend every waking moment on here, how'd this get past you? You can save everyone the dissertation regarding my dislike for you. For everyone's information, I don't think much of CIM. To the rest of you white knights, why didn't you charge in on your white horses and rescue these damsels in distress? Don't you know that according to CIM, these dancers now have a target on their backs? Every stalker out there has now been informed of these dancers and the club where they can be found. In all seriousness to the readership on here, in your opinion is there anything wrong with this type of content appearing in a discussion or a review? Reviews currently get passed with this content, should guidelines change to turn them down if they do? If I was a visitor to this club and limited time, I'd find this kind of content useful. Of course I am responsible for my own vetting and YMMV but if others have given the opinion that so and so has a bad attitude or has left them disappointed, I'd keep that in mind if she plopped down next to me. All I see are a few general positive statements and contributions where a visitor wasn't pleased with a dancer and shared his opinion. I believe that as the customer, you have the right to include a name if you choose when you share positive shout outs that do not include links to specific acts for specific dollar amounts as well as share experiences you believe were disappointing, underwhelming, etc.